< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
--- Debbie Feder <deborahfederlmt@...> wrote: > Look, you are a computer guy.. You think in > fail/success terms... it > may not be so jarring or depressing to you to think > this way... According to the Economist, 60% of software projects are considered failures by the people who commissioned them, so maybe we programmers ought to think about this even more than we do! Over 60% of Americans are now overweight. Do these two statistics have anything to do with each other? Of course not. But it makes me think that maybe reprogramming mental software has a thing or two in common with the other kind... such as the need for clarity around desired goals and behaviors. If success/failure is too harsh, choose gentler terms, but make sure they're similarly clear. Personally, I like a word with some teeth. > I believe for > some people, the > word failure will actually inspire them to succeed, > but for a bunch > of others, who may already be really sad and in need > of a way > to "cheer themselves on"... setback is helpful You're right. As long as people are aware of both dangers, they'll be ok. Sail between us, folks... > How about "on > target" or "off > target"... this, I actually think, is the best way > to approach our > efforts.. It's non judgemental yet > accurate...Whaddaya think boss? Honestly (pathetically) I think of the scene in star wars where the guy keeps repeating "stay on target... stay on target" right before his x-wing gets vaporized by Darth Vader's tie fighter. But Luke winds up destroying the death star, so I guess it worked... http://shovelglove.com/images/chop_01.jpg (notice mementi mori in background) > Have a orange and fuschia day :) > I will, "descriptively," but prescriptively I'll stick with primary colors. Reinhard |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.